People buy a gamevice case because it adds buttons to an iPad/iPhone they already have. People buy a switch because it's a gaming console. Why sue Nintendo for making a handheld console when there are other companies who make game cases for the same devices(that look much more similar)? Bigger settlement from Nintendo, if they get anything at all. Nintendos legal team will squash this pretty much immediately. I completely disagree about the two being remotely similar. Who knows whether that sleight of hand will fly in court. The lawsuit claims the Nintendo console itself is the structural bridge which helps secure the console. IMO the case is quite strong, but the patent requires the two controllers be connected by a structural bridge, which helps secure the console between them. As for the lawsuit, I agree it stinks, and I hope it fails, but it's nowhere near as simple as whether the two look alike (and they do look alike btw). It's has nothing to do with Bluetooth though, as far as I can tell. I got a Gamevice recently and it's actually pretty good. They are just sue happy because their product blows and the switch is awesome(aside from software).I got a Gamevice recently and it's actually pretty good. If anything it looks like a cheap, Wii U knockoff. As for the tablet/gameboy that gamevice realeased, that contraption looks nothing like a switch. Get rid of the apple iPad shown in the pictures and what you have is a laughable design that piggybacks on another companies product(iPad). All gamevice has is a Bluetooth slide over controller for iOS. I'm not sure they even look remotely similar unless that company has a patent on buttons and controls.
0 kommentar(er)
